Tony Posted September 29, 2012 Report Share Posted September 29, 2012 http://www.mytimingbelt.com/ Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vipercar93 Posted September 29, 2012 Report Share Posted September 29, 2012 Don't have my car =( Dodge days 100k miles.. People have been snapping them at 75k.... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tango Posted September 29, 2012 Report Share Posted September 29, 2012 The IS-F has a chain, as did the IS250, so no worries. However, the IS200 had its belt changed at 60K, not 100K as advised by that site. Peeps have had the belts go way before 100K. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rick101 Posted September 30, 2012 Report Share Posted September 30, 2012 105K on an S-type. Always thought it was a bit of as strange figure. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Posted September 30, 2012 Author Report Share Posted September 30, 2012 Wonder if the site is liable if there is misinformation? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted September 30, 2012 Report Share Posted September 30, 2012 Mine is a chain so no worries there. Civic is 72k miles but it was done by the last owner at 69k miles. The car is now on around 103k miles so it should be good for another 40k but I'll get it changed in a year or 2. Wonder if the site is liable if there is misinformation? The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. The information is provided by www.mytimingbelt.com but sourced by 3rd parties and while we endeavour to keep the information up to date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. In no event will we be liable for any loss or damage including without limitation, indirect or consequential loss or damage, or any loss or damage whatsoever arising from loss of data or profits arising out of, or in connection with, the use of this website. Through this website you are able to link to other websites which are not under the control of www.mytimingbelt.com. We have no control over the nature, content and availability of those sites. The inclusion of any links does not necessarily imply a recommendation or endorse the views expressed within them. Every effort is made to keep the website up and running smoothly. However, www.mytimingbelt.com takes no responsibility for, and will not be liable for, the website being temporarily unavailable due to technical issues beyond our control. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vipercar93 Posted September 30, 2012 Report Share Posted September 30, 2012 Haha in other words we try to keep it right but it's not always going to be the case. You follow at your own risk lol Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freaky Roadster Posted October 3, 2012 Report Share Posted October 3, 2012 The MX5 list is wrong, there's no 94 to 97 and they have 1.8's listed under the 89 to 93. I believe they were only 1.6's during those years, the 1.8's coming out in 94. Says 60k for the 89 to 93 which is correct but whatever car you have always reckon on 5 years or 60k Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.