Jump to content

Thorin

Basic Member
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Thorin

Previous Fields

  • Vehicle
    MKIV Toyota Supra

Thorin's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

0

Reputation

  1. But I have larger tyres at the front too than the stock set up (235/255), but yes. Thanks for the reply. I've not had anyone else so far recommend the second lot of settings. I'm just after something a bit less understeery and more balanced really, while not so much as to send me oversteering into a tree, so I think my mind is made up on the Lance settings Another question while I'm here, anyone recommend anywhere to get my alignment setup done in or around the west yorkshire area?
  2. Hi folks, only just recently discovered this forum and there's some very good info on here. I'll shortly be getting my alignment done and was after people opinions on here. I own a '94 MKIV Toyota Supra RZ (Twin turbo), it's on the stock j-spec bilsteins and springs and 245/40/18 front, 275/35/18 back tyres. In stock form the supra is a rather heavy understeery beast so I was looking for something a bit more 'planted'. 99% of the time (if not more) the car is to be used on the road though so I'm not after some race setup or something that's going to give excessive uneven tyre wear. The following info is from http://mkiv.com/techarticles/lance_alignment/index.html (pasted here for convenience) and the "Lance" set up seems well regarded... Now that sounds good to me, but a member on the mkivsupra.net forum has been very vocal about some other settings, and even states that the stock settings, and the Lance ones, are rubbish. The settings however make no sense to me (positive camber on the front??), but I'm no expert. Is he on to something? Settings follow... Thanks in advance for your comments, Michael.
×
×
  • Create New...